June 25, 2009
-
- http://www.iamlanders.com
- Thursday, Jun. 25, 2009 @ 11:36:39 pm
-
- http://www.iamlanders.com
- Thursday, Jun. 25, 2009 @ 11:38:46 pm
As talented as he was I have no sympathy for a pedophile who takes his own life.
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 01:29:14 am
how can you be so sick?
HAVE SOME FUCKING RESPECT FOR THE DEAD-
- http://www.iamlanders.com
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 08:40:40 am
Go crawl back under your rock inbreed! This is real life, something you know little about!
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 07:31:51 pm
how am i an inbreed?
you dont even know me
Mr.. im so fucking fab because im fat and gay
fucks sake get a life and go back 2 where you came from http://www.4chan.org/

X-
- http://www.iamlanders.com
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 07:33:55 pm
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 07:45:16 pm
oh and by the way im 30 years of age and i know plenty about life i was abused by my dad when i was young, raped when i was 23, seen my nan die of cancer and ive had my own mental health problems
maybe i should have killed myself when i was 7 then i wouldnt be here having so much fun arguing.
you feel the need 2 have a go at me because of my opinions and spellings
but why
really
is it because i have depression/anxiety/ocd?
fuck it im not normal
and i dont care anymore
i mean who wants 2 be normal?-
- http://www.iamlanders.com
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 09:29:58 pm
Actually what started this was YOU having a go at ME for MY opinions.
Now, if you're not too busy flicking yourself off to McFly maybe you should be writing to Trisha or Jeremy Kyle, I'm sure they have a seat with your name on!-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 09:34:01 pm
i dont flick myself off to anyone
YOU made it personal
by calling ME and my family inbreeds
i was just saying be respectful
a man has died
regardless
and He was found innocent-
- http://www.iamlanders.com
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 09:35:53 pm
Check your facts. He was acquitted. He wasn't found innocent.
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 09:45:04 pm
ok i admit it maybe i was wrong {at least i can admit it}
oh and by the way
check your comments
so lovely and personal
I NEVER got personal with YOU til YOU called ME and MY FAMILY inbreeds
so, yes i did reply with a nasty comment because you dont know my family
im sure you would do/have done the same!?!-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 09:47:38 pm
Your shouting was pretty aggressive, how did you expect him to react?
You really don't know him very well at all...-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 10:08:41 pm
now who is jumping to his defence?
i shouted because i was upset at the comment
and i am allowed to be upset and shout
stop talking me down
kthanxbye-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 10:11:25 pm
I don't know if I'm doing that, actually. I was just pointing out that you were being aggressive.
You're allowed to be upset, but you're NOT allowed to take that out on other people just because you feel like it. He's allowed to share his opinion.
If you can't deal with people challenging your opinions, maybe you should keep them to yourself.-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 10:19:53 pm
well if i had had this reply 2 my first comment then it might not have gone pete tong
answer me this is it ok to call someone and their family inbreeds?-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 10:27:29 pm
So it's OK for you to have a go, but people can't bite and have a go back? If you dish it out, you have to take it too.
I think the inbreed comment was meant to imply you were stupid, and I have to say you've given him plenty of ammunition. Does it really matter what someone on a blog site calls you? If it's not true, it's not true. No, it's not particularly mature, but there you go.-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 11:02:07 pm
ive been through much worse than this so yes i can take it
and...
i take anything said about my family {esp my nephew} very seriously
you dont talk about my family like that
how would you like it if your friends/family were called inbreeds by someone who doesnt even know them?-
- http://soyunperdedor.blog.co.uk
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 11:05:26 pm
Personally, I'd take the attitude that seeing as they don't know them, I don't have to take it to heart. Unless of course they were touching a nerve, then I might get upset.
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 11:12:45 pm
You've been through worse than some name calling on a blog site? Do you want a medal?
You make comments about things like suicide - have you actually got any personal experience of suicide? We have. And sometimes you HAVE to make light of things, or you'd never get over them. Laughing at things isn't bad - it's healthy.
Who mentioned your nephew? Go back and read the comment - he called YOU inbred. YOU. Not your family. Of course, by extension that means your parents too, but the point was you are being stupid. That's what he meant.
How would I like it? If they didn't know me, I wouldn't care. In fact, I'd probably laugh.-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 11:24:34 pm
and yes i want a fucking medal
ok so answer me this
even if i havent had any personal experience of suicide does this mean i have had no life experience?
and so me and my family deserve to be called inbreeds?-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 11:31:40 pm
This is getting boring.
I didn't say anything about life experience, I asked about experience of suicide. You were very high and mighty about it, and I wanted to know what qualified you to tell someone else how they should feel about it.
Just get over it. He called you a name. You called him a name. He's not going to apologise for it after all this. Like I said, ignore him and he'll go back to ignoring you.
Get on with your life, and try not to take things to heart. It really doesn't matter.
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 11:17:10 pm
p.s. in my opinion i think it is very disrespectful to talk about ones family as inbreeds
it is also really quite hard for me to believe it was ment in any other way because it was put so personally
{and as ive said before i take any comments about my family seriously because my dad used 2 be nasty about my nan after she died}
and as for the "ammunition" paddy has
great
i wish him luck with it
because by branding me an "attention seeker"
it means that he thinks that all those with mental health problems are "attention seekers"-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 11:22:48 pm
I'm not going over all this again. I'm fed up of it.
I will say that calling YOU an attention seeker does not in any way say other people are attention seekers. He didn't say "all people with mental health issues are attention seekers".
Take the comment personally if you must, but what are you going to do about it? It's a blog!-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 11:40:43 pm
so if somone called you an inbreed, picked on you because of your spelling and branded you an "attention seeker" because you havent tried to kill yourself this year regardless as to weather these comments were online or to your face you wouldnt take any of it personally?
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 11:54:25 pm
Again, it was Nick who commented on your text speak, and NOT your spelling.
Look at it this way. A random person on the internet calls you a nasty name. What are you gonna do? Call the police? You can't do anything but ignore it.
You can't make him take it back, you're just winding yourself up and we're sat here finding it all very amusing that you're so worked up about it.
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 11:53:17 pm
and as ive said before i replied to the first comment because i was upset and it could have been left or a reply like... "whatever lets just agree to disagree"
but paddy and others became personal by picking on me and calling me names, having a go at my spelling etc
its very disrespectful
im not saying i cant take it
im just saying i think its disrespectful to pick on anyone like this just because i was upset about the first comment and yes it was wrong to shout and swear on the first comment but i was upset
its like he cant forgive me because i am young and i am still learning but i wont be talked down to just because im not a perfect blogger
so what if i cant spell and i use txt talk
sofuckingwhat-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 11:59:40 pm
And like I said before, why should YOU be treated any differently than you treat others? You shouted, he got annoyed. If you can get angry, so can he.
NOBODY HAD A GO AT YOUR SPELLING.
Shouting at people is disrespectful.
It's nothing to do with forgiving you, he doesn't care about you or what you think. Why should he? And why should he be nice to you if you're not nice to him?
Like I said, ignore him.-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:05:47 am
if he doesnt care about me or my comments/opinions and spellings etc why did he respond in the first place?
& you just shouted at me
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:13:34 am
Why shouldn't he?
And yes, I did. Because I was fed up of repeating myself.-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:50:31 am
seriously though
if paddy/landers doesnt care about me or my "disrespectful opinions/spelling/text talk or attention seeking" then why on earth did he reply in the first place?
im sorry, but i really dont understand this, do you?-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 10:36:20 am
Oh, get a grip!
Landers didn't comment on your spelling/text talk, NICK did!
And why shouldn't he reply when you attack him verbally? That really isn't the issue, it it?
-
- Tuesday, Sep. 15, 2009 @ 08:59:33 am


x
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 09:40:20 pm
the other thing i found really sick is how you talked about suicide like it was the way he went when no one knew how he has/had died when you made that comment
suicide is not funny-
- http://www.iamlanders.com
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 09:47:26 pm
Quite right, suicide isn't funny. Neither is hearing you go on about it! In fact the way you belittle suicide is fucking sick! Christ how many times are you going to cry for help and then turn it down? You're as bad as every other attention seeker! Now, I'm not going to reply to any other comment you make or leave as you're just a childish little girl crying out for attention which I'm not going to give you! Go bleat on your blog about how awful I am and how hard it is for you. Go cry about how I ignored you emails and how I pushed you to the edge. You and your constant whining is enough to drive any insane! Now, fuck off.
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 09:59:51 pm
i am not a little girl
and im not talking pescritions for a fucking laugh
nor am i talking them to be an "attention seeker"
you have very little information about something and someone that you know nothing about
but i guess certain bloggers will use anything they have to attack others
i honestly believe you are a member of 4chan
because you are sick like them
& just like my father
a sick little man who has nothing better to do with their time than abuse the internet and the people who use it innocently-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 10:07:11 pm
I'm guessing you've lost track of who Landers actually is after his account name change, given that you used to email him all the time. I think he knows you pretty well.
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 10:12:49 pm
yes i know its paddy
i might have actually emailed him like once
quick question because im a bit confused.com
do you mean actual email or blog message?
in which case i have emailed once and sent a blog message once-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 10:14:26 pm
No, I mean weekly emails about McFly and Robbie Williams and more.
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 10:30:08 pm
weekly emails?
can i see some proof?-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 10:33:39 pm
Oh don't be so ridiculous. Does it actually even matter?
You don't agree with each other. I suggest you just ignore him and his opinions from now on. Don't comment on his comments, and he'll continue to ignore you, just like he was before you provoked him.-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 10:53:28 pm
you were the one who was saying i sent weekly emails to paddy
i am just upset at the first comment
if paddy thinks im so childish in my spelling/commenting why did he reply to me in the first place?
paddy could have left it
or sent me a message/email about it
but no
paddy got personal and called me and my family inbreeds
this post was put here for discussion
and it has been {and probably will go on} being discussed.
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 11:12:10 pm
Honestly, why? What difference will it make? It has nothing to do with any of this. As it happens, I can't provide proof. The emails I'm talking about were literally YEARS ago, when we lived in Wales and you were Buzzy Bee or whatever, and before the wonders of Gmail's archive feature. He didn't keep the emails, he didn't expect them to be called in as evidence.
I think you'll find it was actually Nick who commented about your writing style (text speak) - nothing to do with spelling.
Landers replied because you pissed him off. Just like he pissed you off. You could have sent him a message/email about it but no. It works both ways.
Like I said, does it actually even matter? He doesn't agree with you,it happens, get over it.-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:25:48 am
so these "emails" are from years ago?
and there was only one email actually
i think you might mean the email blog.co.uk send you when someone writes a private post yes?
well the alerts can be turned off via settings
so i didnt actually send them
so get your facts right before you bring it up again-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:30:48 am
Yes, as I said, these emails are from when you posted as Buzzy Bee. And no, I mean EMAILS not notification emails. You emailed him directly. He has talked about them before, and confirmed it tonight.
Believe me, I'm regretting bringing them up in the first place. They literally have nothing to do with anything here, and I can't believe you're focussing on them so much.
I really am going to bed now. -
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:07:46 am
*ahem* you have to accept that one 100 years old (private!)email that "literally have nothing to do with anything here" will be discussed here in detail... for everyone to read (and possibly discuss?)...
actually I wanted to go to bed, but now I find things get more and more... interesting ('trollish' so to speak...)
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 10:44:06 am
I was making a side point that she seemed to have forgotten how well Landers knows her. I can't prove these emails, but that doesn't mean they never existed. But yes, in essence they have nothing to do with the main point here that she had a go at Landers and got upset that he had a go back.
What you don't seem to understand is that Landers and beautiful_mistake have a history on blog. This wasn't a random thing.-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:33:10 pm
I apologize for the fact that I don't know all the history on blog - my excuse is I am not that old, you know, some things seem to have happend soooo long ago.
Hope you accept my excuse. Thanks in advance.-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 02:10:15 pm
Thank you, but there's no need to apologise for that; just please bear in mind that there may be more to what you read than is first apparent.
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 02:14:37 pm
(you have delivered comment number 200!)

-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 09:43:39 pm
and aww just aww
pads i think you are very sweet comparing me to a lamb because i bleat
why dont you carry on asking other bloggers if they are still friends with me and why?
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 01:32:09 am
Innocent unless proven guilty
-
- http://www.iamlanders.com
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 08:46:25 am
In the second case of abuse I think he was innocent and they were just after money. The fact that he settled out of court on the first shows his guilt in my opinion.
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 10:12:50 am
He got a rather extreme "get out of jail free" card.
-
- Thursday, Jun. 25, 2009 @ 11:44:20 pm
It's a shame, but we've all got to go some time. Although there's plenty of tweets about sleeping pills, so maybe it wasn't actually his time yet...
-
- http://subville.blog.co.uk/
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 12:02:39 am
Lots to think about. I actually do feel for him, he seemed so simple minded. Like he had learning difficulties, from his weird upbringing. Much as I hate paedos.
Can't decide if suicide in his case was noble, sad, pathetic or what.-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 08:32:35 am
-
- http://www.iamlanders.com
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 05:41:56 pm
Your excellent advertising skills have certainly made want to go and check them out!
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:41:57 pm
hey, I am disappointed you don't sell any Shox Electric in pink - all pink, I mean.
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 12:35:49 am
Is he or is'nt he ?thats the question.
Well i cant be sure if he was a paedo.. RIP MJ
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 12:43:56 am
i dont belive he was a peado for definate

-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 01:28:08 am
neither do i
and i dont know how people can be so fucking sick talking about cuz hes dead
HAVE SOME FUCKING RESPECT 4 THE DEAD-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 10:15:21 am
Certainly.
could you have some respect "for" the english language. "Because" it makes posts nicer to read.

-
- http://www.iamlanders.com
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 11:53:14 am
Nick, I love you!
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 12:05:41 pm
beautiful_mistake's language is quite ok - it's solid average standard:
- 'cuz' is an usual 'texting term' for those under 30.
- as to 'FUCKING' - that is a word you are using yourself about half a dozen times in every post on your blog.-
- http://www.iamlanders.com
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 05:48:57 pm
Well done for picking out the word "cuz" but maybe you got stuck after that and couldn't work out what else was wrong so went with the word fucking.
Fail!
4. It's a number, a digit. It's not a word. Four is a word. 4 does not mean for in "standard" English.
The only thing "standard" about the comment is that it's typically her. No correct punctuation and no correct grammar and ranting because someone else dares to have an opinion. No wonder you jumped to her defence.-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 06:16:00 pm
I never jump, and never in 'defence' of anyone, as far as 'defense' will be understood in the ususal sense here on blog. (I would, however, always use my excellent defensing abilities to defense you, for instance, but in totally other issues than language related – and independent of what herd opinion you might support).
I just made a comment cuz [sic] of the language issues, namely: I stated her language is quite average, more exactly, not less average than the language of those that question her language.
Btw, "ranting because someone else dares to have an opinion" is not such a seldom phenomenon on here, methinks...
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 07:24:07 pm
i am "her" and i ave a FUCKING NAME
i was upset at the comment and i am allowed to write and spell however i wish because i am so fab at it

-
- http://www.iamlanders.com
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 07:31:31 pm
Blah blah blah...
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 12:23:18 pm
Sooooo tempted to reply to a couple of comments on this thread, but I don't want to feed the trolls...
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 12:27:34 pm
Yup!
poor things.

-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 12:40:58 pm

-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 12:45:04 pm
BOL! @ image!
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 12:52:43 pm
I stole it through the wonder of Google images.

-
- http://www.flickr.com/photos/rithompson/
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 01:19:45 pm
haha.

-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 04:40:11 pm
Sorry to jump in.. Love the 'Troll Feeding' image!! BOL

-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 05:19:44 pm
Google's finest.

-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 07:33:33 pm
how very lulzy
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 07:45:38 pm
Indeed.
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 01:52:33 pm
Good greif. Easy there.
Just because you're dead doesn't mean you instantly demand respect.
Howabout Hitler...?-
- http://faffajane.blog.co.uk/
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 03:42:11 pm
Never did like the man or his music. Never thought he was anything special. Fed up with the media hype surrounding him, don't think he deserves any respect just because he is dead either, didn't deserve any when he was alive, why now that he is dead?
Oh as for text language it isn't 'proper English', therefore it is unreadable, please limit it if you don't mind!
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 03:48:44 pm
What a common sense point of view. What on earth are you doing posting such rational things on a blog site?

-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 04:09:07 pm
I know, I'm sorry - I don't know what came over me *wafts self with piece of paper*
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 06:35:41 pm
respect for M Jackson, or for Hitler is, of course, very different from respect "for" the english language (or German language, for that matter)

Always look at the bright side (of the comments)! ...
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 08:06:59 pm
What exactly is your point here? KidVicious100 was replying to beautiful_mistake, not Nick. Nothing to do with the English language comment by Nick.
Incidentally, why is it that you keep replying to Nick's comments on other people's posts? You know he doesn't like you, and he never replies any more. Why be annoying? Do you enjoy trying to wind people up?-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 09:47:23 pm
I don’t "reply" to Nick's comments, I simply comment on them, when I consider a comment is necessary. Comment policy on Juzzy’s blog is very liberal, so I understand, everyone can comment, if they feel there is something worth commenting.
When I comment (on whatever post, or comment of other blogger) I don’t look first who says, but concentrate on what they say.
If I – incidentally – comment on one of Nick's comments, then Nick can reply (or not), if I – incidentally - comment on KidVicious100's comments, then KidVicious100 can reply (or not).
May I ask what exactly is YOUR 'role' - or 'point' - in all this?
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 10:01:26 pm
My role? Curious bystander, trying to make sense of things. My point? I don't have one, I was asking questions.
I'm sorry, but you do "reply" to his comments. You take the substance of what he says, which is normally a flippant joke, and try to make something out of it that isn't there. Like I said, you know he doesn't like you, and it looks from the outside like you're trying to provoke a reaction. People can of course respond if they choose. He doesn't, and I was curious as to why you persist.
Now, if you'd be so kind as to answer my question, what does the English language have to do with KidVicious' comment?-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 10:13:44 pm
If I was a 'curious bystander' I would not interfere with others' comments - but that is only what I would do, is not a recommendation.
To your Q: if you read the comments once again - without hate or prejudice, just concentrating on what was written - there is no need for me to 'explain' what I said. All I said is still there to read (in all it's beuty...
...)-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 10:14:12 pm
in all its beauty, I mean
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 10:21:44 pm
Interfere? Is asking a question interfering? To quote you, "Comment policy on Juzzy’s blog is very liberal, so I understand, everyone can comment, if they feel there is something worth commenting."
Have I showed hate or prejudice? Perhaps you are pre-judging me.
I read what was written and what was written does not make sense to me, which is why I asked you about it. If there was no need to explain it, I would not have asked - believe me. You have not been helpful - quite the opposite. You have been evasive, bristly and supercilious.
I think I'll end this conversation there, thanks.
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:31:42 am
"Respect?"
I did not think you understood the term at all.
So can we look forward to you showing some for other people's opinions in the future then?-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:17:29 am
Now just imagine, many things that you "did not think" about do happen tough, and do exist already. You just have to look more in detail.
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:19:28 am
Sorry, your remark does not make any sense at all.
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:21:44 am
you might want to read it once again?
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:27:30 am
Why on earth would I want to do that?
-
- http://www.iamlanders.com
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 09:58:09 am
I read it again and you're right... no sense.
-
- http://juzzzy.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 10:02:50 am
ALL of you - pack it the fuck in.
Or at least do it on a Thai Tale, and make me think something I'd written was worth fucking rowing about.-
- http://soyunperdedor.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 10:59:59 am
This is your punishment for lazy posting. One word linked to a dubious source? Shame on you. Bring out the trolls.
-
- http://juzzzy.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 11:07:25 am
The BBC is dubious?
Come on Soy - let's have an argument!
x-
- http://soyunperdedor.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 11:10:18 am
Fucking hell you sick bastard, you don't even know the alphabet.
Actually, I think I'd prefer to have some toast and jam x
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 10:53:23 am
BOL
X
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:38:12 am
maybe/maybe not
but i dont think im the only one
also...
if paddy/landers doesnt care about me or my disrespectful opinions/spelling/text talk or attention seeking they //why// on earth did he reply in the first place?
im sorry, but i really do not understand this, do you?-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:41:46 am
I understand that Justgrrl is exploiting your distress to get attention for herself.
But that is what she does. My remark is addressed to her and not to you.
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:57:36 am
so you cant answer my question?
and i was replying 2 your comment about having no respect i.e. not knowing the meaning of the word! ^^^-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 10:59:32 am
I cannot answer you question, because I am unclear what you are asking me.
I think if someone is expressing their honest opinion about someone, then, whether the person they are talking about is dead or not, it is not disrespectful, they are just expressing THEIR honest opinion.
Juzzzy's post was not (and still is not) about you, it was about Michael Jackson.
Personally I also dislike the habit of using text speak on blog, I do not think it is necessary.
-
- http://faffajane.blog.co.uk/
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 02:05:28 pm
If only but she doesn't know what that means does she?
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 02:18:44 pm
you delivered comment number 199.

-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 04:37:34 pm
Evidently not.

X
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 08:58:56 pm
i was just saying be respectful
a man has died
regardless
and He was found innocent
-
- http://www.iamlanders.com
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 09:34:09 pm
No he wasn't.
He was acquitted. This means they didn't have enough evidence to find him guilty. It's very different from being proven innocent.
Oh... and only the second time... the first time he settled out of court. Yes, because that proves he's innocent!-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 11:37:07 pm
What beautiful-mistake said – initially – was, in fact, the old adage "De mortibus nihil nisi bene" which is an ancient (quasi ethical) 'wisdom' of laconic brevity, and with a (somehow) human touch. It might be an attitude some of us can't share, or even find it wrong (like ViciousKid tried to explain through a certain other historic 'example' - quite nice!) – that is absolutely ok - but I believe it is not ok to pick on beautifu-mistake's 'English language skills', and on her (presumably) 'inbreed' origins. Nothing to say about the secondary and tertiary ‘confrontations’ that started from that.
I expaect you will swear with me now - but you might know by now that it will have not the slightest 'convincing' effect on me.-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 11:39:02 pm
btw, I added this just to increase the number of comments...

-
- http://www.iamlanders.com
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 11:43:10 pm
Nope, not going to swear WITH you. Might sweat AT you though.
Your comment actually makes no sense. It has no relevance to the comment you REPLIED to... yes you did reply, this is just a random comment from you, and you're obviously just trying to cause more trouble. Shows what a vile skank you are. Don't bother to reply and try and explain as your English is a bit shit so I'll probably just ignore it.
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:06:11 am
this comment actuallly makes the whole sense - it is a recapitulation of what happened since beautiful_mistake said 'he's dead now, have respect' (in the sense 'de mortibus...'), then someone picked on her English, then I said her English is not worse then other people's English, then someone said she is 'inbreed'´... well, that is where the 'essential' terminates. After that... all is prattle (including your correcting my English, which has no great relevance, as it is not my native language).
cheers!-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:07:43 am
you know that I know that you don't bother with what I say - but I added this comment (again
...) to increase still more the number of comments 
what if you'd try smiling a bit?
-
- http://soyunperdedor.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:10:04 am
Are you paid per comment?
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:00:18 am
No... But I am

-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:25:18 am
Please feel free to respond in your native language if you find English difficult. After all this is an international community and English is the second language for many bloggers so possibly someone on here will be better able to translate it for us.
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:30:02 am
you have just delivered comment number 145.
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:36:56 am
Congratulations, at least you can count.
x-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:45:35 am
Your assumption is wrong, I don't 'count' the comments, the number appears automatically in the links line - a quick glance above and you can read the actual comments number (for instance it's 151 right now - for me, time to go to bed)
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:50:21 am
I know, but I just assumed you had nothing better to do.
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:58:15 am
a wrong assumption again, as I could not have any time to do either counting not anything else, considering the efforts you all have made to deliver so many comments, nearly all at once (I could not even drink my tea... so busy I was with reading all the prattle... no time for counting... really not
... sorry to disappoint you! 
-
- http://magicalmysterytour.blog.co.uk
- Sunday, Jun. 28, 2009 @ 06:58:21 am
Bloody hell I think I just spent 1 pound reading all this in the cyber cafe! Have I got nothing better to do on the last day of my holiday??
Anyways here's what I think (just to throw in my pennies worth) MJ was a very talented man, however he had a lot of demons and was a little strange.
I know he wasn't proved guilty of being a paedo but everyone has to relieve themselves sexually at some point, the trouble is he obviously spent rather a lot of time with children instead of adults. If I were to go by the law of averages I would probably conclude that there was no smoke without fire.
But alas I am neither psychic or an oracle so I cannot judge. Hopefully if there is an afterlife then all his demons have left him! (and if he was guilty then children are now safe)
-
- Sunday, Jun. 28, 2009 @ 04:16:53 pm
That's not what you were saying at all. You were being quite vulgar.
But nevermind.-
- Thursday, Jul. 02, 2009 @ 11:08:10 pm
KidVicious100
Because i havent brought my life on ebay and seeing as i do not get email notification from blog.co.uk [because i have turned that setting off] do tell me if this comment is directed at me?!?

x
And... apologies in advance if my english isn't great here because there are bloggers who get very upset and comment about my "writing style"/text speak [i also think they mean grammar, spelling, and punctuation] nothing to do with spelling. [as Bradley said, bless him]
many thanks
beautiful_mistake
x
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 12:45:29 am
A legend!
R.I.P -
- http://www.conspiror.blog.co.uk
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 01:55:05 am
strange but true that i feel sorry about him dieing so early.I am not a music fan,but jacko was an exception.Loved his music,loved his style.RIP jacko
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 08:07:09 am
This will turn into a bloody farce and he will be 'seen' for years just like elvis. Is he dead or just off somewhere getting a new identity and a new life...
-
- http://faffajane.blog.co.uk/
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 03:43:08 pm
The aliens took him lol

-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 08:11:36 am
So sad. What a wasted life. He had no idea really about reality (remember when he bought Liz Taylor that elephant?). I always think it is sad when someone so young (he was only 50 after all!) dies, but I guess that is the best way with folk who are so famous. That way you don't see their demise into senility.
-
- http://www.flickr.com/photos/rithompson/
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 10:35:53 am
As sad as it is when someone dies, it isn't a particularly big loss for music as Jacko hadn't had a decent song for at least twenty years!
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 12:45:45 pm
Yowch! But true!
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 11:05:25 am
Forever blowing Bubbles....
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 09:52:00 pm
there is no 'forever' (like... there is no 'free lunch')

-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 05:22:14 pm
People who say thee is no free lunch just don't know where to eat
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 01:47:29 pm
At shite-karaoke next week, I shall be doing a Jackson tribute song. Perhaps "Beat It". I will shake it like a Polaroid picture.
-
- http://juzzzy.blog.co.uk
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 01:53:38 pm
You, KidVicious-o, are living the dream with karaoke.
Can I come?
x-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 02:06:01 pm
I AM living the dream. Everyone wants to be me.
Sure! Pop down and be entertained at the country's finest sticky-floored pub! x
-
- http://www.iamlanders.com
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 09:37:25 pm
Have you seen what you've done Dunn! One word with a link. That's all it took!
You are most powerful!
I bow to you.-
- http://juzzzy.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 07:52:35 am
I'm quite astounded, frankly.
-
- http://www.hotmail.com
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 10:22:35 pm
why are you all doing this?
talk to those you care about about things that concern you.. the simple fact you are online exchanging opinion (and insults!?) with others (that you don't even seems to know suggests to me a deep-seated desire for something i will never want to understand.
--FORM YOUR OWN THOUGHTS--
i am only here by chance but know this, your thoughts or words do not matter to me.
shame on you all-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 10:38:40 pm
Thus spoke Zarathustra!

-
- http://www.hotmail.com
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 10:38:59 pm
no u!
-
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 11:41:42 pm
you mean... Zarathustra without 'u'?
Ok, then: Thus spoke Zarathustra! -
- Friday, Jun. 26, 2009 @ 11:58:00 pm
lulz
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:10:10 am
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:22:48 am

-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:42:04 am

-
- http://subville.blog.co.uk/
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:03:02 am
Oh dear

I bet you've gone out for the night too! Lots of mail tomorrow then
x-
- http://soyunperdedor.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:05:19 am
Hilarious innit? There's hyper-sensitivity...and then there's that ^^^ ...
xx-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:16:22 am
As if they don't know Landers is not just smiling, but guffawing.
He's loving it!
In his DEFENCE, some people really are too sensitive.-
- http://soyunperdedor.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:18:26 am
He shouldn't be so fat and gay, then he might realise what other people have been through and why his opinion on MJ's death is so destabilising for them.
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:20:27 am
Heavens to Betsy, you're right! It's all his fault for not taking other peoples' opinions on just because they shout at him. Naughty boy.
-
- http://subville.blog.co.uk/
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:16:30 am
I'll come back to read this next time I'm having a down day, for sure. They really got the measure of Justrrroll too
x -
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:17:18 am
ermm i kinda know jj
&he just confurmed what i already knew
there are certain people here who are troll like and they really only understand this kind of talk...
"lulz"
"do a barrell roll" etc
google 4chan & internet memes-
- http://soyunperdedor.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:20:27 am
I'm not referring to that, I was referring to you going ape-shit for Landers 'daring' to insult you. Slightly out of proportion reaction, in my opinion.
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:32:47 am
he did though
may i ask you if you were called an inbreed
or picked on for whatever reason you wouldnt take it personally?-
- http://soyunperdedor.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:38:28 am
I'll repeat what I said above:
Personally, I'd take the attitude that seeing as they don't know my family, I don't have to take it to heart.
He actually called YOU an inbreed, it's you who have chosen to extend that to your family. But even if he had called them it, so what? If you know they're not, what difference does it make if some bloke you don't even know says it on the internet? You over reacted to his opinion in the first place, remember.
And, Landers being Landers, he likely only chose that word because it was the first insulting term that popped into his head. He could've called you any number of colourful things.
So no, if I was in your situation right now, I would not take it personally.
-
- http://www.iamlanders.com
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 10:02:06 am
You're nearly right.. I only chose it as I thought it was the only one she would understand.
But being fat and gay means I only a limited vocab anyway!
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:40:41 am
ah, you see, soyunperdedor is reproaching you that your action was only "slightly" out of proportion. She means you should have done it much more "out of proportion" than only "slightly".
-
- http://soyunperdedor.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:43:24 am
No, I don't.
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:43:39 am
hey, beautiful-mistake, that's a funny idea of soy, let's play "calling people any number of colourful things" - see what they say!

-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:51:48 am
no i wont do that to others jg
because it is disrespectful
and a form of bullying!
i know im not perfect or "in" with the "in blog crowd"
but so what
who wants to be like them if they are going to be like this?-
- http://www.devonwallart.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:55:07 am
To be fair I think Paddy and Brad are pretty much confirmed as "out"...
-
- http://www.iamlanders.com
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 10:03:56 am
BOL!!!
Hahahaaa!!!
OH MY GOD I LOVE BLOG!-
- http://juzzzy.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 10:05:45 am
Actually, I take back my earlier admonishment.
It is extremely important that we get this up to 200 comments.
Landers, darling, how much of a cunt am I for shagging The Worst Person In The World?-
- http://www.iamlanders.com
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 10:08:19 am
You're not at all.... she is.
Don't worry, Brad will be awake shortly, he'll soon start.-
- http://juzzzy.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 10:10:15 am
I have a date today!
But not with a weirdo - how odd is that?-
- http://www.iamlanders.com
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 10:19:50 am
I wouldn't say it's odd, I'd say it's a challenge. How are you going to cope with
himher not being a weirdo?-
- http://juzzzy.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 10:21:43 am
I'm going to remind
himher why I'm such a fabulous person - and then get very, very, drunk, and prove otherwise.-
- http://www.iamlanders.com
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 10:24:11 am
Ah! So you're going to be you! That'll be nice, it's been a while since you were allowed to be yourself.
-
- http://juzzzy.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 10:25:40 am
We're going to catch up, share sob stories, and stare into the distance.
I'm quite looking forward to it.-
- http://www.iamlanders.com
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 10:28:23 am
I hope you have a lovely time.
Maybe you could leave us with another one word blog entry before you go?-
- http://juzzzy.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 10:30:50 am
I'm not going yet - lunchtime.
But I SO will leave another one word post.
Oh yes !
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:38:49 pm
but you know that if you go away I will comment on that post that you will leave before you go...

-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 07:40:28 pm
Wow! "The worst person in the world." Well, I suppose it depends on whether it was an act of desperation, act of charity or pure martyrdom on your part. You might be canonised in years to come.

X
-
- http://soyunperdedor.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:56:18 am
I repeat, b_m - you flung the insults first. I'm not saying it justifies Landers calling you an inbred, but really, don't take that personally. You don't mean enough to him for it to be meant personally.
As for calling everyone else an 'in crowd', well, that's an argument jg always falls back on anyway, so I knew we'd get to that in the end. It's as irrelevant as the rest of these comments, so may as well throw it in the mix.-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:45:42 am
yes i was upset
in shock
i couldnt talk to anyone about how i felt when i heard the news because it was at one o clock in the morning
and i repeat...
if paddy/landers doesnt care about me or my disrespectful opinions/spelling/text talk or attention seeking then why on earth did he reply in the first place?
im sorry, but i really dont understand this, do you?-
- http://soyunperdedor.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 10:47:50 am
He never commented on your text speak/spelling - Nick did. That's been pointed out a few times now. Let that one go or take it up with Nick.
I do understand it. He replied to you calling him sick in an aggressive manner because you pissed him off. It's quite simple really. If you know what he's like at all, it can't exactly be a surprise that he reacted. You gave him lots of material by going into victim mode. I love him but yes he can be a bit of an argumentative chap sometimes (to put it mildly) and the best thing to do is ignore him if he upsets you, like you would anyone, not just on blog.
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:25:57 am
While Landers can be trollish when provoked (can't we all?) there's a PRIME example of a troll right here on this thread.
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:38:40 am
oh really
where
ahh yes i remember something of the like http://juzzzy.blog.co.uk/2009/06/25/michael-jackson-is-dead-6392147/#c10266621
you bite and i will bite back-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:50:27 am
now, you see? It goes like this:
if you comment with good arguments and the other one feels he has lost, then you are a troll
if they comment with insults, and you bother to take attitude, then you 'over-react'

-
- http://subville.blog.co.uk/
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:11:03 am
Naah, YOU are a troll cause you go looking for comments to wind people up with.
B_M over-reacts cos ... that's just what she does. We've known her for a while. Many have been on the receiving end of it.
What you tend to do is say that we are some kind of 'in' crowd because some of us get pissed off with your inane comments, trying to sound intellectual and failing miserably.
You know full well that you are a wind-up. Your attempts at humour are slightly off and that probably annoys you. Maybe you could've been 'ok' but you started off on the wrong foot here. If you really want to improve relations (who knows, maybe you do?) it'd be better if you wound yer neck in a bit and quit being so fucking irritating.
With all due respect.-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:20:31 am
You have delivered comment number 140.

-
- http://www.devonwallart.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:23:34 am
Actually you did, the trick is to take the number of comments in the post then count back in the recent comments list on the right hand side.
Advanced maths for some, I accept, but, bless your heart, we know you'll try.-
- http://www.iamlanders.com
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 10:05:32 am
BOL! Again!
I've only been awake about twenty minutes and I've spent the entire time reading all this and pissing myself! (it'll be the age thing you know!)
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 02:18:49 am
with all due respect
if paddy/landers doesnt care about me or my "disrespectful opinions/spelling/text talk or attention seeking" then why on earth did he reply in the first place?
im sorry, but i really do not understand this, do you?
so who is being so fucking irritating?
who threw names at a blogger who was simply upset at one just one comment
at o clock in the morning so yeah might not have been quite with it
and this name calling stared a full six hours after
why?
also is it not a over reaction to brand anyone a "attention seeker" just because they might have some or very little information about this "attention seeker"?-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 10:56:54 am
Subs was talking about JG. But now? YOU are being irritating. You're repeating the same thing over and over.
Landers doesn't care, THAT'S why he was able to call you an inbreed - because it means nothing to him. You've taken it to be this big thing where he's tarnished your honour and you can't let it go until reparations are made. Well, that's not gonna happen, so you may as well get used to it.
What difference does it actually make to your daily life that someone you've never met and never will called you a nasty name on a blog site somewhere?-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 09:36:49 pm
i just write a blog here
and answer a few comments
its not real life you know as you keep saying so why should i let it affect my daliy life?
oh what am i gonna do?
maybe i should call the police
bloggers giving me the fear becuase i dont know the correct ways of spelling
and subs was talking about me
quote subs 'B_M over-reacts cos ... that's just what she does. We've known her for a while. Many have been on the receiving end of it.'
oh and there is a link below in case you dont believe me
because im not part of the "in crowd"
http://juzzzy.blog.co.uk/2009/06/25/michael-jackson-is-dead-6392147/#c10272153-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 09:45:45 pm
D'you know what?
I really can't be bothered any more.
There is no "in crowd". Just friends. And I'm glad I'm not one of yours.
This is the last reply you'll get from me.
-
- http://subville.blog.co.uk/
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 03:01:42 pm
I was answering Trollgrrrl. If you'd got an email notification it would mean I'd answered you.

Why are you asking me about Paddy? Ask him.
Maybe he called you an attention seeker cos you write in capitals whenever someone says something you don't like. Remember all the stuff about Robbie Williams? That's just ONE episode, there have been a few more. Yeah we all get angry but come on! I don't hate you. I think you're annoying, but I wouldn't blank you. You're part of this community and there's a certain amount of affection for folk's odd characteristics. Chill.
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 09:22:17 pm
there is talk of me "overeacting"
but what about old nick and paddy "overeacting" to my spelling mistakes?
{why do you think ive got the username beautiful_mistake?}
this is also what i ment by "in crowd"
i was told off by the "in crowd" because i dont know the correct ways of writing and spelling things
it felt as if the "in crowd" were making fun of this flaw which is obvious
and i recall there being ONE single RW "episode" and that was on my own blog
but oh and then again
with all due respect you are also part of the "in crowd"
-
- http://subville.blog.co.uk/
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 09:33:02 pm
*yawn*
My comment about the 'in' crowd was to JG, she's the one who goes on and on about it.
You whined at me about Robbie Williams in one of my posts, or on a comment I made.
Paddy didn't mention your spelling, did he?
I really don't think there IS an in crowd, and if there is, I'm pretty sure I'm not part of it
Go away, it's over now.-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 09:47:13 pm
oh i think there is an "in crowd"
because other bloggers have been asked before this if they are still friends with me and why-
- http://subville.blog.co.uk/
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 09:54:29 pm
Not by me.
[/end]-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 11:31:25 pm
I didnt say by you.
[/fin]
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 10:38:18 am
I think you've completely misunderstood me, and what a troll is. Maybe you need to go and google it again. Wikipedia has a good definition.
That is a picture of a troll, and in no way trollish behaviour. It was a joke.
I was not referring to you here or up there.
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:32:41 am
To borrow and mess with an album title...
"one day it will please us to look back and remember this"

x
-
- http://www.devonwallart.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:50:50 am
Just fucking great...
Now I'm going to have to make a winning graphic in next year's Bloscars for "most blown out proportion comment thread"...-
- http://soyunperdedor.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:52:23 am
Can you design us all medals for getting through this? It's been so tough.
-
- http://www.devonwallart.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 12:53:55 am
The Taupe Appendix, for bravery in the face of Trollish Attack.
-
- http://www.gilraen.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:56:34 am
Oh please, they MUST have this category next year. Although I fear it would be 'handbags at dawn' between Juzzzy and Landers

-
- http://www.devonwallart.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 02:01:47 am
Now hang on, all Juzzy's done is post this and bugger off to the pub

-
- http://www.gilraen.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 02:09:24 am
I know! It's a bit like the best supporting actor Oscar.
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:04:22 am
Well.. I have to say.. This is the best comment thread Ive read for a long time.. If not ever!
x-
- http://soyunperdedor.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:06:23 am
I wouldn't glorify it with 'best'... x
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:11:23 am
Am I feeding the trolls?!
-
- http://soyunperdedor.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:11:49 am
Yes, das ist verboten!
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:33:34 am
i am actually waiting for comments toi reach the number 150, after which i'll go to bed.
Hope you'll have fun with all this, Juzzy!
-
- http://www.devonwallart.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:38:56 am
Could you do us all a favour and confirm your leaving conditions earlier?
We would have worked so much harder if we'd had an enjoyable target to aim for.
-
- http://www.gilraen.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:54:23 am
Yes! Top of Buzz once again.
-
- http://juzzzy.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 07:29:15 am
Jesus.
Thank fuck I wasn't on here last night.
Thanks all - because I really need all this right now, don't I?
-
- http://soyunperdedor.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 10:58:04 am
Oh stop pretending, stats-fiend.
-
- http://juzzzy.blog.co.uk
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 11:09:40 am
Ha - honestly wasn't online at all last night.
Probably not a bad thing, considering....-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:27:58 pm
I, for one, believe you were not online at all last night. See how I trust your exemplary honesty?
(this comment was not necessarily added to increase the comment number - *expects a bribe tough*)

-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 09:03:46 am
Oh my goodness!
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 11:02:23 am
What the fuck was that all about?
I started reading this with a fully charged battery and now I'm down to 10%!
-
- Saturday, Jun. 27, 2009 @ 01:22:59 pm

-
- Sunday, Jun. 28, 2009 @ 09:37:17 pm
*whispers to Juzzzy*
Did I mention blogland was quiet?
Now, how do I find these Thai tales? x-
- http://juzzzy.blog.co.uk
- Monday, Jun. 29, 2009 @ 09:09:03 am

Read backwards, if you get my drift.
http://juzzzy.blog.co.uk/tags/thai-tales/
-
- http://rowtheboat.blog.co.uk/
- Monday, Jun. 29, 2009 @ 09:22:59 am
Michael who?
-
- Tuesday, Jun. 30, 2009 @ 01:23:27 am
- Michael,
to our generation we wanted to dress, move and sing like you...
in a society in portugal were colour was a problem... you united us with your creativity.
Thanks 4ever little angel.
2 sky -
- Friday, Jul. 03, 2009 @ 11:12:48 am
all this argueing came from a post about showing respect for someone
wow
how ironic

-
- Wednesday, Sep. 16, 2009 @ 04:00:48 pm
and I'm spent....phew
-
- Friday, Oct. 09, 2009 @ 01:02:19 pm
OMG this is fucking ridiculous.
-
- Saturday, Oct. 10, 2009 @ 12:05:51 pm
Hahaha just read all that (took a while) and its so bloody funny!! well done everyone for your patience in trying to get it to understand!!
-
- http://www.handbagcom.com
- Thursday, Oct. 22, 2009 @ 08:14:21 am
LandersUK
meh!